Key results of observation on Prospekt Mira, Kaliningrad: 

The street is heterogeneous in terms of usage practices, but it is impossible to call it “central” - Central functions in one form or another appear only on the eastern side of the street, however, they also turn out to be separated from the really central part of the city by a pseudo-center (Teatralnaya st., Mira avenue, st. Ushinsky)

Based on the practices of city residents, the following structural elements can be distinguished on the street:
1) pseudo-center, characterized by low tourist activity and almost no activity of residents;
2) the territory from the Central Park of Culture and Culture to the Drama Theater, characterized by the growth of central practices from west to east, a large number of young people among the daytime population (due to the college and art school), and also being the only zone of nightlife;
3) unstructured territory on the street. Grekov, characterized by the fact that cars of the daytime population of Mira Avenue are parked on the street, and the territory is also used for transit movement from Mira Avenue to Pobeda Square, which is more convenient than Mira Avenue itself;
4) the territory of "Sleeping Europe" from the Flower Market to the street. Chkalov, characterized by daytime business practices and morning and evening "home" practices (walking dogs, walking with children, leisure cycling);
5) non-residential area from the street. Karl Marx to st. Basin, including public spaces: churches, green areas (well-groomed and not well-groomed), a pond, a waterfall, a restaurant, a stadium, a square, which has a recreational potential, while poorly developed;
6) undeveloped territory from the street. Basseinaya to the cemetery, characterized by a general feeling of abandonment and a decrease in the number of passers-by to almost zero when moving from the center.